Members Home

Timetable

Clinical Information

 

DIARY AUTUMN 2006

12/10/06

12/10/2006 Mental Capacity Act 2005

Mental Capacity act is a wide subject and it can stimulate rich discussion as people have different opinions viewing the same issue form different angles.

Tom was the mastermind of the session. He presented us with an excellent presentation. He started with definition of capacity and the legal tests for it:

Take and return the information relevant to making the decision and consequences of refusal.

Believe information

Weigh up the information and arrive at a decision.

Then we split up into six small groups, each had two classical –real life cases to discuss together. Cases were picked up by Tom and prepared by Muna. The cases were about patients refusing medical treatment. We discussed their mental capacity, right of refusal, legal tests for their capacity as well as patient’s best interest and other moral issues.

We then had a large group discussion and feedback on the sensitive and controversial areas in our small group discussion.

Tea and biscuit brought by Kerli. We then came back together for the second part of Tom’s presentation which explained the following areas:

The Mental Capacity Act will help people make their own decisions.

The Mental Capacity Act will not start until 2007.

The Act will affect people in England and Wales and who are 16 years and older.

The Act will protect people who can not male their own decision about something. This is called ‘lack of capacity’.

The Act tells people:

o What to do to help someone make their own decision about something.

o How to work out if someone can make their own decision about something.

o What to do if someone cannot make decision about something sometimes.

 

The Act Main ideas is a list of 5:

o Start off by thinking that everyone can make their own decisions.

o Give the person all the support to help them make decisions.

o No-one should be stopped from making decisions just because someone else thinks it is wrong or bad.

o Anytime someone does something or decides for someone who lacks capacity, it must be in the person’s best interest-there is a checklist for this.

o When you do something or decide something for another person, you must try to limit your own freedom as little as possible.

The Act sets out the rules on:

o Acts in connection with care and treatment.

o Advance decisions to refuse treatment.

o Research involving people who lack capacity.

The Act introduces:

o New lasting power of attorney (LPA): is a legal document where you can say in writing who you want to make certain decision for you, if you cannot make them for yourself. It will cover areas of health, welfare, property and money.

o Deputy: is a person who can make certain decisions for you if you cannot decide for yourself.

o New court of protection. There will be a judge; people will argue their case and the judge will decide what is best.

o New Public Guardian who will be in charge of the office which looks after the paperwork and applications for LPA and deputies, keep an eye on what deputies do and work with police and Social Services when they think someone have been abused.

o New Independent Mental Capacity Advocate Service ( IMCA). The Act sets up a new service to help people when important decisions have to be made involving health services and local authority services like social services and housing department.

o A New criminal offence- it will be against the law to badly treat someone who may lack capacity that you care for.

 

 

There was no hot topic. Chris invited us to share some interesting cases that we saw during the previous week which we had useful discussion on.

Muna

19/10/06

Palliative Care - Group 5

A very interactive session, started off with Sunil giving a chance to the various groups to come up with their ideas of palliative care and the various people forming the team providing it, before coming up with the definition of palliative care (working and WHO).

‘Comprehensive, interdisciplinary care of patients and families facing a terminal illness, focusing primarily on comfort and support.’

WHO: "An approach that improves the quality of life of patientsand their families facing the problems associated with life threatening illness, through the prevention and relief of suffering by means of early identification and impeccable assessment and treatment of pain and other problems, physical, psychosocial and spiritual."

.The key issues in the discussion being symptom control, psychosocial and spiritual care, personalised management plan, and family oriented care- during illness and during bereavement. The various conditions needing palliation (terminal cancer, dementia, CHF, COPD.) were discussed as was the contrast in the kind of services provided for some of these conditions (cancer Vs. CHF)

Emma soon took over and discussed the clinical aspects of palliative care (things that we thought we knew, but soon realised otherwise!) The presentation mainly dealt with symptom control, ‘pain’ being perhaps the most common and important symptom requiring control (though 30% of people with cancer have no pain).Regular analgesia, pain ladder.

non opoid eg paracetamol

weak opoid eg codeine + non opoid

strong opoid eg morphine + non opoid

.The use of strong opioids was discussed as was the mode of delivery of drugs ( using syringe driver) oral being the preferred route.

Start opoid with immediate release morphine

Titrate against pain- 50 increase every 2-3/7

When controlled, change to MR morphine / fentanyl patch

Rx immediate release morphine for breakthrough pain

.Nausea and vomiting( address the cause), constipation(prevention better than cure), breathlessness(positioning, stream of air, explanation and reassurance,oxygen,BDZ, opoids, nebulised saline etc. ) anorexia and cachexia(diet/nutritional supplement,Cortcosteroids, Prokinetics) confusion and agitation, and mouth(unsweetened chunks of pineapple for coated tongue!) and skin problems being the other symptoms needing attention.

Chin gave a new dimension to the discussion when each group were given a situation / scenarios to have a feel of the patient’s perspective of concept of palliative care. Thought provoking discussions about ‘End- of-Life’ issues, good/ bad death, advance directives, resuscitation status, and religious and spiritual needs, took place.

Muna presented the hot topic on TIA’s which was well prepared and reinforced the management of the same.

Sunaina

09/11/06

Thursday 9th November 2006 – Travel Medicine (Group 6)

The session started with feedback on the Balint session of the previous week – it was suggested that perhaps we should have these sessions more regularly, possibly including a case every other session or so.

Then Alex and Lizzie did a role play – A pregnant lady wants to go abroad on holiday

Learning points –

The IATA allows people to fly up to 38/40 but some airlines are only to happy to fly ladies up to 36/40. They will not fly those with previous preterm deliveries or DVT.

If do fly one is at increased risk of DVT so mobilise at least every 15 mins and do vein pumping exercises, wear seat belts below the pelvis.

Vaccinations are generally advised against (risk v benefit – little evidence)

Avoid Malaria areas (pregnancy attracts mosies) – if no choice can take chloroquine and proguanil but also take folic acid suppliments.

Avoid loperamide if get diarrhoea.

We split into 4 groups to discuss 2 scenarios Alex had prepared regarding giving advice to people going on vacation

A few of the learning points -

Ensure they have correct health insurance – if have chronic disease advice organise insurance through the support group

Ensure enough tablets and that they are legal in country visiting – have written documentation in their language if may be issue

Be prepared for flare ups of conditions egs asthma; take steroids and course of antibiotics in case with advise of when and how to use

Investigate medical facilities available on the holiday

Advise against vacations which are obviously going to exacerbate medical problems

Alex also provided us with a useful pre holiday advice sheet.

A break for cake (oops no-one brought any but Alex kindly saved the day with some hospital donuts)

Shambhawi started off the next part of the session with an overview of rabies and yellow fever, she had also prepared Japanese encephalitis and tick bourne encephalitis but as time was running short didn’t present them. All of the information was however provided on a hand out for us.

Misbah provided a handout about malaria.

We had a quick break from Travel medicine whilst Shambhawi did her hot topic – a case presentation of a patient with Q fever. An interesting DD for PUO!!

http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dvrd/qfever/

Back to travel medicine we then split back into the 4 groups to discuss 4 scenario’s of post holiday presentations which Lizzie had prepared – travellers diarrhoea, DVT, insect bites, STIs, sun burn and sun stroke.

For each case we discussed what the important questions to ask were and examinations to perform, the differential diagnosis, management and advice that you would give the patient for the future.

For more information check out - http://www.traveldoctor.co.uk this is a really good site with loads of info on lots of aspects of travel medicine.

The only area not covered on this site is gonorrhoea which you should suspect if a man presents with a thick purulent penile discharge – generally I would advise that you refer them asap to a GU clinic for formal diagnosis, treatment counselling and contact tracing but if you do not have access treat with either azithromycin 1g/ PO stat or ciprofloxacin 500mg stat and then refer on if poss. See http://www.emedicine.com/med/topic922.htm

Mary then concluded our session with a fun quiz of contraindictions to flying and provided a hand out summarising the facts.

NB.

If anyone missed the session and would like copies of the handouts I will try to organise to get these on line.

Lizzie

16/11/06

Breaking Bad News

Your next patient comes in and he has a letter in his hand. He is visibly upset, shaking and VERY annoyed. He has been told that at the time of his successful hip operation he had nearly 3 years ago, he might have been exposed to a ‘health care worker’ who has subsequently tested positive for HIV and Hepatitis. The news is bad and you have to deal with it. Can you do it? How good are you with breaking bad news? This was the theme for this afternoon, led by group 1- Dave, Kerli, Uzma, Soumen and Manuel.

We met up at the Post Grad Centre at Kidderminster (not so promptly – I might add!). After a brief introduction by Dave Hughes, we split into 5 groups of 3 each (that’ll give you the number of attendees). We were all given 3 scenarios each, which we had to ‘role-play’. One had to pretend to be a patient (difficult), the other had to observe and the third one had to pretend to be a doctor (extremely difficult). However, I think we all knuckled down to our tasks. Coffee break was tempting, as Uzma had placed the Tesco bags strategically.

Scenario 1

Doctor

Mr/Mrs Jones came to see you after receiving a letter from the hospital concerning exposure to a certain healthcare worker. They are very concerned and come to see you. You need to explain about the recent HIV/HEP B positive Health Care Worker and break the bad news.

Patient

You are Mr/Mrs Jones and you receive a letter from the hospital concerning exposure to a certain healthcare worker. They are very concerned and go to see your GP. You have seen the news about the recent HIV/HEP B positive HCW and are now convinced that you have both the conditions. (Feel free to be outraged and lay it on thick).

Scenario 2

Doctor

You have been asked to see a 90 yr old lady in a nursing home who has dementia, diabetes and IHD and PVD. She is totally dependent, doubly incontinent and has been refused surgery previously on the basis of her quality of life and co morbidities. Today, the home says that she is unwell and "Knocked Off". When you examine her it becomes obvious that she has an acutely ischaemic leg.

Mrs Smith’s daughter/son arrives and asks to speak to you.

Patient

Your mother, Agnes Smith is 90, in a nursing home and has dementia. She has many other diseases including heart problems, diabetes and vascular disease. The home ahs called you to say she is unwell, can you come to see her immediately. The GP is present and you want to speak to him/her.

Reluctantly, you agree with his/her plan but you are very aware that your older brother will disagree.

Doctor

Mr/Mrs Jones came to see you with a chest infection that did not resolve. You diligently arranged a CXR. The report shows widespread cannonball metastasis. Mr/Mrs Jones comes for the result.

Patient

You are Mr/Mrs Jones. You have been treated for a chest infection, but it did not resolve.

Your GP suggested a CXR and you come for the results.

After the first 2 scenarios, we broke for coffee and regrouped to continue with the ‘role-plays’. After finishing the 3rd and last scenario, we all sat together again to share our experiences and lessons.We learnt the following points.

Do’s and Don’ts Of Breaking Bad News

Do’s

Have the facts to hand.

Clear enough time

Control Potential interruptions

Switch off bleep

Ask colleagues not to disturb you

Divert phone calls

Use ‘do not disturb’ sign if in general office.

Check if patient wishes anyone else to be present

Negotiate approx time consultation will take and explain need to take notes

Clarify what the patient already knows or suspects

Be prepared to follow the patient’s agenda

Observe and acknowledge patient’s emotional reactions

Nervousness

Fear

Stop if patient indicates that they do not wish to continue

Check patients understanding of what you are saying

Don’t

Make assumptions about

The impact of the news

Patient’s readiness to hear news

Who else should be present?

Patient’s priorities

Patients understanding

Give too much information at one time

Decide what is most important for the patient

Give inappropriate reassurance

Answer questions unless you have the facts to hand

Hurry the consultation

Use euphemisms eg. "little ulcer" when you mean ‘cancer’

Block emotional expression from the patient

Break bad news to relatives before telling the patient

Agree to relative’s demands that you withhold information from the patient

23/11/06

Child psychiatry/ Behaviour

Group 3

The session started off with a presentation by Sarah

Key points

Child & adolescence mental health service

- 5 –layered structure with Layer 1 being those directly in contact with children/adolescents and Layer 5 being the specialist mental health teams.

-Focuses mainly on psychological assessments

- Multidisciplinary team involving psychiatrists, clinical psychologists, psychiatry nurses, social workers, educational therapists etc

- Normal emotional development of children is influenced by genetic predisposition, environment and family (parenting styles, adversities etc)

- Lengthy separation from parents leads to protest, despair and eventually detachment

Problems can be sub divided into 3 categories

Preschool--------Meal refusal

Sleep related problems

Tantrums

Breath-holding attacks

Aggressive behaviour

Autism

middle school- nocturnal enuresis

Faecal soiling

Recurrent abdo pain

ADHD

Antisocial behaviour

Anxiety

School refusal

adolescence – anorexia nervosa

Chronic fatigue syndrome

Depression

Deliberate self harm

Drug misuse

 

- then we went on to see video clips from a popular television programme showing commonly encountered family situations involving children and different strategies to manage them.

- we had an interesting discussion regarding different ways of dealing with ‘bad behaviour’ in children which included

rewarding /acknowledging good behaviour

ignoring the bad behaviour,

compulsory time outs etc

This was followed by a presentation by Urmila about enuresis and ADHD

Key points

-very common

- boys> girls

- familial predisposition

- can be associated with psychological issues

- avoid undue anxiety , most will resolve spontaneously

-enuresis alarms- attached to child’s pants

-drugs – last resort

 

then Fiona did a quiz involving key points regarding ADHD

- diagnostic features of ADHD – inattention, impulsivity, hyperactivity

-DDs- autism, learning disorder, thyroid disease, psychological problems,epilepsy, drugs etc

- more common in boys

- ?incidence increasing

Bipin

Course Organisers 

Chris Wilkinson, Steve Walter & Gilly Cooper

web designed by Chris Wilkinson, North Worcestershire VTS